Monthly Archives: May 2009

How You Can Be Like Buffett

In every other issue of my investment newsletter, The Validea Hot List, I look in detail at one of the computerized guru models I run on In this week’s issue, I outlined my Patient Investor strategy, inspired by the approach that Warren Buffett has used to become one of history’s greatest investors. Below you will find an excerpt from the newsletter along with a handful of top-scoring stock ideas based on the Buffett investment strategy.

Taken from the May 29, 2009 issue of The Validea Hot List

Guru Spotlight: Warren Buffett
With his humble mid-west beginnings, plainspoken wisdom and wit, and incredible wealth, it’s no wonder that Warren Buffett has become the most-watched investor in the world. But while the juxtaposition of Buffett’s fortune (Forbes estimated his net worth at $37 billion earlier this year) with his love of simple pleasures (he’s a big fan of Cherry Coke and cheeseburgers) is intriguing, the more important piece of the Buffett puzzle for investors is this: How did he do it?

My Buffett-based Guru Strategy attempts to answer that question. Based on the approach Buffett reportedly used to build his fortune, it tries to use the same conservative, stringent criteria to choose stocks that the “Oracle of Omaha” has used in evaluating businesses.

Before we get into exactly how this strategy works, a couple notes about Buffett and my Buffett-based strategy: First, while most of my Guru Strategies are based on published writings of the gurus themselves, Buffett has not publicly disclosed his exact strategy (though he has hinted at pieces of it). My Buffett-inspired model is based on the book Buffettology, written by Mary Buffett, Warren’s ex-daughter-in-law, and David Clark, a Buffett family friend, both of whom worked closely with Buffett.

Second, while most of my Buffett-based method centers on a company’s fundamentals, there are a few non-statistical criteria to keep in mind. For example, Buffett likes to invest in companies that have very recognizable brand names, to the point that it is difficult for competitors to take away their market share, no matter how much capital they have. One example of a current Berkshire holding that meets this criterion is Coca-Cola, whose name is engrained in the culture of America, as well as other parts of the world.

In addition, Buffett also likes firms whose products are simple for an investor to understand — food, diapers, razors, to name a few examples.

In the end, however, for Buffett, it comes down to the numbers — those on a company’s balance sheet and those that represent the price of its stock.

In terms of the numbers on the balance sheet, one theme of the Buffett approach is solid results over a long period of time. He likes companies that have a lengthy history of steady earnings growth, and, in most cases, the model I base on his philosophy requires companies to have posted increasing earnings per share each year for the past ten years. There are a few exceptions to this, one of which is that a company’s EPS can be negative or be a sharp loss in the most recent year, because that could signal a good buying opportunity (if the rest of the company’s long-term earnings history is solid).

Another part of Buffett’s conservative approach: targeting companies with manageable debt. My model calls for companies to have the ability to pay off their debt within five years, based on their current earnings. It really likes stocks that could pay off their debts in less than two years.

Smart Management, and an Advantage

Two qualities Buffett is known to look for in his buys are strong management and a “durable competitive advantage”. Both of those are qualitative things, but Buffett has used certain quantitative measures to get an idea of whether a firm has those qualities. Two of those measures are return on equity and return on total capital. The model I base on Buffett’s approach likes firms to have posted an average ROE of at least 15% over the past 10 years and the past three years, and an ROTC of at least 12 percent in those time frames.

Another way Buffett examines a firm’s management is by looking at how the it spends the company’s retained earnings — that is, the earnings a company keeps rather than paying out in dividends. My Buffett-based model takes the amount a company’s earnings per share have increased in the past decade and divides it by the total amount of retained earnings over that time. The result shows how much profit the company has generated using the money it has reinvested in itself — in other words, how well management is using retained earnings to increase shareholders’ wealth.

The Buffett method requires a firm to have generated a return of 15 percent or more on its retained earnings over the past decade.

One more area Buffett examines: capital expenditures. He doesn’t like to invest in companies that must spend a lot of money on major facility or equipment upgrades, or that need to spend a lot of money on research and development to stay competitive. My Buffett-based model thus looks for companies that have positive free cash flows, an indication that the company is generating more cash than it is consuming.

The Price: Is It Right?

The criteria we’ve covered so far all are used to identify “Buffett-type” stocks. But there’s a second critical part to Buffett’s analysis: price — can he get the stock of a quality company at a good price?

One way my Buffett-based model answers this question is by comparing a company’s initial expected yield to the long-term treasury yield. (If it’s not going to earn you more than a nice, safe T-Bill, why take the risk involved in a stock?)

To predict where a stock will be in the future, Buffett uses not just one, but two different methods to estimate what the company’s earnings and stock’s rate of return will be 10 years from now. One method involves using the firm’s historical return on equity figures, while another uses earnings per share data. (You can find details on these methods by viewing an individual stock’s scores on the Buffett model on, or in my new book, The Guru Investor.)

This notion of predicting what a company’s earnings will be in 10 years may seem to run counter to Buffett’s nonspeculative ways. But while using these methods to predict a company’s earnings for the next 10 years in her book, Mary Buffett notes: “In most situations this would be an act of insanity. However, as Warren has found, if the company is one of sufficient earning power and earns high rates of return on shareholders’ equity, created by some kind of consumer monopoly, chances are good that accurate long-term projections of earnings can be made.”

A Strong Rebounder

My Buffett-based 10-stock portfolio is well ahead of the S&P 500 since its December 2003 inception. Where the model has really excelled, however, is coming out of downturns. In 2004, as we were emerging from the lengthy recession associated with the tech stock bust, the Buffett portfolio surged 37.3%, more than quadrupling the S&P’s 9% gain. In addition, after struggling in 2007 and 2008 amid the latest recession and bear market, the portfolio has bounced back strong this year as things have begun to turn around. The portfolio is up 16.8% in 2009 — including 30.7% in the past three months — while the S&P is up 0.4% for the year. It’s no surprise given Buffett’s penchant for pouncing on good, beaten down stocks, which usually abound during tough times as investors let fear get the best of them. (One of Buffett’s mantras is that investors “should try to be fearful when others are greedy and greedy only when others are fearful.”)

These stocks are not the kind of sexy, flavor-of-the-month picks that catch most investors’ eyes; instead, they are proven businesses selling at good prices. That approach, combined with a long-term perspective, tremendous discipline, and an ability to keep emotions at bay, is how Buffett has become the world’s greatest investor. Whatever the size of your portfolio, those qualities are worth emulating.

So what good buys is my Buffett model seeing now? Here’s a handful of its favorites:

China Mobil Ltd. (CHL): Chinese cellular giant has increased EPS in each year of the past decade, has enough annual earnings to pay off all its debt in a little over a month, and has an average 10-year return on equity of 23.1%.

Garmin Ltd. (GRMN): GPS specialist has upped earnings in eight of the past ten years, has no long-term debt, and has generated a 26.3% average annual return on retained earnings in the past ten years.

ITT Educational Services (ESI): Tech-focused private college program has averaged a whopping 39.5% return on equity over the past ten years. It also has increased EPS in every year of the past decade, and has debt of $150 million compared to annual earnings of $221.5 million.

Imperial Oil Limited (IMO): Canadian energy firm has upped EPS in nine of the past ten years, with the last dip coming eight years ago. Its annual earnings ($3.1 billion) dwarf its debt ($30.6 million), and it has generated a 28.4% average annual return on total capital over the past decade.

Fastenal Company (FAST): Industrial fastener specialist has no long-term debt, has increased EPS in nine of the past ten years (with the most recent dip eight years ago), and has generated average annual returns on equity and total capital of 20.1% over the past decade.

Roubini Offers Good News (Sort Of)

Nouriel Roubini — the economist who predicted the economic crisis and who has been dubbed “Dr. Doom” for his dire predictions — now thinks the global recession will end later this year, significantly earlier than he has previously predicted.

“We are not yet at the bottom of the U.S. and the global recession,” Roubini told Reuters. “The contraction is still occurring and the recession is going to be over more towards the end of the year rather than in the middle of the year” as many have predicted. That might not sound very positive, but keep in mind that two months ago, Roubini said he thought the likely length of the recession (which began in December 2007) was moving toward 36 months, which would have brought us into late 2010.

Read more

Guru Upgrades/Downgrades: IBM Falling, Walgreen Rising

Each week, I take a look at which stocks my Guru Strategy computer models have newfound interest in, and which they have soured on. Here’s a look at some of the stocks that my strategies have upgraded or downgraded today. Among the big-name movers: IBM, Chevron, Walgreen, and General Dynamics.

Guru Strategy Upgrades/Downgrades -- May 27, 2009

Guru Strategy Upgrades/Downgrades -- May 27, 2009

Zweig: WWGD? (What Would Graham Do?)

Writing sixty years to the day after Benjamin Graham’s classic The Intelligent Investor was published, Jason Zweig says that Graham would be cautious amid a market like this one.

“Today the market seems to be in just the kind of mood that would have worried Mr. Graham: a jittery optimism, an insecure and almost desperate need to believe that the worst is over,” writes Zweig, whose commentary accompanied the 2003 version of Graham’s famous book. “[Graham] almost invariably read the enthusiasm of others as a yellow caution light, and he took their misery as a sign of hope.” Today, with the market’s 10-year P/E ratio having risen from 13.1 to 15.5 since March — the sharpest, fastest rise in 25 years — Zweig says investors should be seeing a yellow caution light.

Read more

Yale’s Swensen on Asset Allocation — and Why to Avoid Mutual Funds

On WealthTrack with Consuelo Mack, Yale endowment guru David Swensen discusses his thoughts on how individual investors should structure their portfolios, where the markets are headed, and why you should steer clear of mutual funds.

According to Swensen, who as manager of Yale’s endowment has grown the university’s portfolio from $1 billion to about $17 billion during his 24-year tenure, says that long-term individual investors should focus on equities — especially now. “With a long time horizon you should have an equity orientation, because over longer periods of time, equities are going to deliver better results,” he says. “If they don’t, then capitalism isn’t working. And we could well be at a point where investments in equities are going to produce returns going forward that are higher than what we’ve seen in the past five or ten years, and we could well be in a position where bonds are priced to produce lower returns. When you see Treasuries with coupons of 2% or 2.5% or 3 %, that doesn’t really bode well for prospective returns.” Swensen says it’s impossible to predict future returns, but adds, “I would say with today as a starting point you could expect, over reasonable periods of time, to be rewarded for equity exposure.”

Read more

Fisher, Others See Big Value in Russia

Kenneth Fisher and two other major money managers are making aggressive stock plays in Russia, where turmoil and problems persist but valuations are at the lowest levels of the 50 major markets, Bloomberg reports.

“Russia in some ways today is just a levered play on the world,” said Fisher, who thinks we are in the early part of a global rally. “Early in a bull market, Russia is going to run more.” A big reason is that Russian stocks fell disproportionately last year, with the RTS Index plunging 72 percent in 2008, according to Bloomberg. The RTS Index fell as low as 2.6 times earnings earlier this year. Now, even after a big rally, shares are still selling for just 5.7 times trailing 12-month earnings.

Fisher isn’t alone.

Read more

Tilson Turns Bearish on Banks

About two months after turning bullish on some financials, Whitney Tilson — who predicted the housing bust and financial crisis — is now taking profits on some of his bank bets and predicting that more financial troubles are on the way.

“There will be a headwind of continued losses for the better part of five years” with banks facing more losses on residential and commercial real estate, Tilson told Reuters, estimating additional losses of more than $1 trillion. Reuters adds that Tilson and Glenn Tongue, his partner at T2 Partners, have stopped their move into the U.S. mortgage bond market. Tilson said financial firms’ balance sheets will remain under pressure as the housing market problems and credit crunch lead to more loan defaults.

Read more

« Older Entries